Trusts in Court?

The nature, history and formation of Trusts.

Re: Trusts in Court?

Postby retlaw » Sat Feb 05, 2011 4:57 pm

[quote="the_common_law_reverend_kenny

How I became a Mod is not the question. If I seem harsh it is because I have seen people lose houses ( my family has lost two) because they go in to court expecting success using half baked theories that just will not work. ( and they lack the real comprehension of 'trusts'.) If someone goes in court like that they will be taken down by tptb.

So if you can say 'of course it could work if done correctly?' back it up with a little real life examples, but there is no back up in this case...is there????. So let me apologise for my comment because It wasn't an attack on you (retlaw), it was a statement about the flawed logic that has surfaced here on this thread (from you).

I agree with Jobs.[/quote]


you answered your own question,

"because they go in to court expecting success using half baked theories that just will not work. ( and they lack the real comprehension of 'trusts'."

if one understood the trust relationship, then one would not have to go to court, its not you they are looking for,
and an abatement does work, it worked very well, i have seen it work, jail time and 50K+ gone,
retlaw
 
Posts: 150
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 1:11 am

Re: Trusts in Court?

Postby the_common_law_reverend_kenny » Sat Feb 05, 2011 5:35 pm

if one understood the trust relationship, then one would not have to go to court,
Excellent Point!

When you say abatement do expand. Many thanks.
SOVEREIGN: not controlled by outside forces: autonomous; self-governing; independent "a sovereign people" <> "by any peaceful administritive means necessary" - the way of the order.
the_common_law_reverend_kenny
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 773
Joined: Fri Oct 30, 2009 1:18 pm
Location: Fidach Diplomatic Outpost near You

Re: Trusts in Court?

Postby ArturoDekko » Sun Feb 06, 2011 6:35 pm

You have raised the question I suppose I should have asked in the first place: "Has anyone used this approach?", it seems none that we know so far.
It has also been suggested that the mere mention of trusts in prior paperwork may be encourage them to drop the whole thing. This could have some credit and is worth a try otherwise no harm done.
One question arrises: Is there some legal document that must exist if the trustee and executor are appointed? If so, could we ask for it as evidence? :8-):
There is also the question of the Eclesiastical Deed Poll, thumbprint in blood to prove life? Has anyone used this?
S E E F O R Y O U R S E L F

Know yourself and you shall know the truth. The truth shall set you free.
User avatar
ArturoDekko
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 647
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2009 11:17 am
Location: Carmarthenshire, Wales

Re: Trusts in Court?

Postby retlaw » Mon Feb 07, 2011 6:53 am

yes it has been used,
if you know what you are talking about then you will have success,

if you don't you will fail,

it just like anything else, no different, you will be tested on your knowledge of the matter to see if in fact you do know what you are talking about and to see if they can break you,

that is their game, they are masters at it,

the ever so controversial, you love him, you hate him, David Merill (Van Pelt) uses the knowledge of the trust all the time,
(to many, David Merill is a discussion all in itself, lets not get stuck in that rut please)




abatements also go by the name of:
non-statutory abatement
christian law abatement
plea in abatement

here is a start to read up on them,
http://usa-the-republic.com/abatements/Index.html
the net is full of sites on abatement,
retlaw
 
Posts: 150
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 1:11 am

Re: Trusts in Court?

Postby the_common_law_reverend_kenny » Tue Feb 08, 2011 1:59 pm

how is it done in the UK?? or should I say the edge of cutting research...along these lines...>>http://tinyurl.com/6y6tuck
SOVEREIGN: not controlled by outside forces: autonomous; self-governing; independent "a sovereign people" <> "by any peaceful administritive means necessary" - the way of the order.
the_common_law_reverend_kenny
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 773
Joined: Fri Oct 30, 2009 1:18 pm
Location: Fidach Diplomatic Outpost near You

Re: Trusts in Court?

Postby ArturoDekko » Tue Feb 08, 2011 8:03 pm

Yes, Rev., that looks like a great success, although they did not use the process we are discussing here which is to directly challenge them to admit the trust and accept their responsibilities. Are there any links to anyone having succeeded with this?

Regarding abatements, have started reading. As I understand abatement, it is saying you are trying to convict me under emergency legislation, my case is not an emergency, I do not consent to being judged in this way, if you want to continue, let us convene a court of common law. First thing I come to is it is mostly American stuff which does not always translate so clearly over here. When were emergency powers brought into England? Has anyone tried abatement in England?
S E E F O R Y O U R S E L F

Know yourself and you shall know the truth. The truth shall set you free.
User avatar
ArturoDekko
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 647
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2009 11:17 am
Location: Carmarthenshire, Wales

Re: Trusts in Court?

Postby treeman » Tue Feb 08, 2011 8:47 pm

A little off topic, but worthy of scrutiny.

Copyright Trademark Name Claim
http://www.fmotl.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=70&t=682


UK version of a DIB hearing
http://www.ico.gov.uk/

I'll send it as a true certified copy with the indenture (Grantor copy and trustee copy), affidavit of ob, cert of dishonor, soi and noi.

CW's last audio at 40mins and then again at 1hr 26 (17th Feb)
www.movingtitles.com audio section

Making the law
http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=zQmMYlQ2l8QC&dq=the+law+on+bills+google+books&printsec=frontcover&source=in&hl=en&ei=F3lhS7E1mrLSBI6PxeIM&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=12&ved=0CCoQ6AEwCw#v=onepage&q=&f=true

The law on bills
http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=zQmMYlQ2l8QC&dq=the+law+on+bills+google+books&printsec=frontcover&source=in&hl=en&ei=F3lhS7E1mrLSBI6PxeIM&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=12&ved=0CCoQ6AEwCw#v=onepage&q=&f=true

The Quistclose Trust: Critical Essays
http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=8vPVZ2lQGLwC&pg=PA105&lpg=PA105&dq=smith+v+hurst,+10+hare,+30&source=bl&ots=ipfE1JQ0qO&sig=FEnjANfCia2sNQOL40U1nYnc4qY&hl=en&ei=XEFjS4OEDZz-0gSn9PnVBg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CAcQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=smith%20v%20hurst%2C%2010%20hare%2C%2030&f=false

jerry kane
http://privateaudio.homestead.com/Jerry-Kane.html
password: makeme

http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/Business/Supreme-Court-Backs-High-Street-Banks-On-Overdraft-Charges/Article/200911415467392?lpos=Business_Carousel_Region_0&lid=ARTICLE_15467392_Supreme_Court_Backs_High_Street_Banks_On_Overdraft_Charges

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8361015.stm

that’s a biggy ^

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8191915.stm

http://www.jstor.org/pss/1111123?cookieSet=1

http://www.archive.org/stream/cu31924021862333#page/n27/mode/2up

http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web/talkCast.jsp?masterId=24353&cmd=tc

www.movingtitles.com

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Blason_duche_fr_Normandie.svg

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Blason_Beaumont_sur_Sarthe_72.svg

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Blason_Arpajon_2.svg



http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Coat_of_arms_of_Lower_Saxony.svg

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/House_of_Hanover

http://famguardian.org/TaxFreedom/CitesByTopic/FiduciaryDuty-Revoking_Fiduciary_Relationships.pdf


Concise manual of the law relating to private trusts
http://www.archive.org/stream/cu31924021862333#page/n3/mode/2up

Maitland on Equity
http://www.archive.org/stream/cu31924084258056#page/n5/mode/2up

books
A practical compendium of equity
http://www.archive.org/stream/cu31924085504060#page/n5/mode/2up

and
Underhill's Law of Trusts
http://www.archive.org/stream/cu31924021862374#page/n5/mode/2up

Christian Walters
http://www.4shared.com/account/dir/26791033/bb0e1503/sharing.html?rnd=50

http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/ad_rem

http://www.justice.gov.uk/civil/procrules_fin/contents/practice_directions/pd_part61.htm
In rem 61.3

Jerry kane audio on foreclosure
http://www.talkshoe.com/tc/39904

http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web/audioPop.jsp?episodeId=176120&cmd=apop

http://www.yourrights.org.uk/yourrights/the-human-rights-act/the-convention-rights/

http://www.officialsolicitor.gov.uk/cfo/payments_in.htm

Note that it says "Payments in to the Court Funds Office are normally made using ..." as in normally as opposed to ONLY...

http://www.opsi.gov.uk/RevisedStatutes/Acts/ukpga/1879/cukpga_18790011_en_1

Banker’s book evidence act

https://www.moneyclaim.gov.uk/csmco2/index.jsp
tax

http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=76DhEY-2Y5cC&pg=PA136&lpg=PA136&dq=Victor+Marsden+published+The+Protocols+of+Zion+1906&source=bl&ots=5uECitO5e4&sig=E9cHZtM0HDFidG80kfaAFPpypMM&hl=en&ei=KWFqS4uPAp_20wSNxaT2Cw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=4&ved=0CBEQ6AEwAw#v=onepage&q=&f=true
protocols of zion 1906

http://www.justice.gov.uk/civil/procrules_fin/contents/parts/part31.htm
protective order 31.19

on sheriffs
http://openlibrary.org/b/OL6415641M/treatise_on_the_law_of_sheriffs_coroners_and_constables

http://dc198.4shared.com/download/215599813/ca552aa4/Sheriffs_Vol_1.pdf

http://dc177.4shared.com/download/215599838/6fb191ae/Sheriffs_Vol_2.pdf

on bonds

part 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sz5g9hOpr68

part 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XdHoKwL1MYQ&NR=1

part 3
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=02vK7ZKy2a0&NR=1

audio section
http://www.movingtitles.com/2394.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homage_(medieval)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fief

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fealty

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seignory

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quia_Emptores#Background_leading_to_the_statute_Quia_Emptores

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gordon_Riots

http://www.iaca.org/node/32


bankers book evidence act
http://www.courts.ie/80256D9F0048007C/0/0009DCE21D7082878025765800375159?Open&Highlight=0,banker,~language_en~


Doctrine of equity
http://www.archive.org/details/doctrineequitya00ralsgoog

equity
http://www.archive.org/search.php?query=equity

http://www.4shared.com/dir/28376043/1d063c57/Law_Dictionaries.html
Complete Black's Law dictionaries

Notary act
legal services act 2007 schedule 5(4)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seal_(contract_law)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authentication

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Witness

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_Charter

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consideration

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conclusive_presumption

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rebuttable_presumption

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principal_(law)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deed_(law)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporation_sole

unclean hands case
http://law.jrank.org/pages/8487/Maxim--He-who-comes-into-equity-must-come-with-clean-hands.html

The Nicene Creed referencing Jesus as a man
http://www.vatican.va/archive/catechism/p1s1c3a2.htm

protective orders, in relation to trade secret’s
http://www.ndasforfree.com/UTSA.html

[22:06:44] By: Grantor/Beneficiary: here ya go... NOI examples....
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
CLAIM TITLE

1. NOI to State (put in block 4 of UCC-1)

This is public notice as by Grantor as owner and holder of all right, title and interest with the nonnegotiable instrument claim by number RA-____________- US with all attachments and proceeds there from being held in the private.


2. NOI to County recorder

NOTICE

This is public notice as by Grantor as owner and holder of all right, title and interest with the nonnegotiable instrument claim by number RA-____________- US with all attachments and proceeds there from being held in the private.

If there is any information that needs to be gleaned please contact the grantor at the address below.

By Grantor: ____________________________


+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

TRANSFER TITLE:

1. NOI to State (put in block 4 of UCC-3)

This public notice as by Grantor as owner and holder of all right, title and interest with the nonnegotiable instrument transfer by number RA-____________- US with all attachments and proceeds there from being held in the private.



2. NOI to County recorder

NOTICE

This is public notice as by Grantor as owner and holder of all right, title and interest with the nonnegotiable instrument transfer by number RA-____________- US with all attachments and proceeds there from being held in the private.

If there is any information that needs to be gleaned please contact the grantor at the address below.

By Grantor: ____________________________


+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

http://www.4shared.com/account/home.jsp

http://www.realdealdocs.com/viewdocument.aspx?DocumentID=238450

Forms
http://law-library.rutgers.edu/resources/forms.php

Loring, Augustus Peabody, Papers, 1896~1926: Finding Aid
http://oasis.lib.harvard.edu/oasis/deliver/~law00156

case on mortgages
http://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache%3AfOJ37R3z0JUJ%3Awww.irmep.org%2FILA%2Frosen%2F11112009_defendants_response.pdf+un&pli=1


Dougs 4shared doc site
http://www.4shared.com/dir/28717353/aa36639c/Docs.html

etymology
http://www.etymonline.com/

Law, religion and equity
http://www.lonang.com/foundation/1/f13.htm

An example of a CD
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:US_Postal_Savings_System_5.jpg


http://www.getoutofdebtfree.org/UK/resourcesmenu.php

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trust_Indenture_Act_of_1939

http://www.4shared.com/account/dir/24776151/b7e02e6f/sharing.html
enjoy

When returning a presentment write on it:
I direct you to separate my records for future return.

http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/publications/quarterlybulletin/qb0801.pdf
page 103 (105 on the pdf)
last para in left coloumn
near bottom of page

http://www.archive.org/search.php?query=conflict%20of%20law
Private International law and tax law

Law Applicable to Trusts and on thier Recognition, signed July 1, 1985
is a short 10 pages
http://www.hcch.net/index_en.php?act=conventions.pdf&cid=59

[19:33:46] imaginethe1: causes of action:
breach of fudiciary duty
breach of trustee
breach of trust
: fraudulent transfer
unfair business practices:
a fraud (gilberts sect 227)
b misrepresentation
c unconsionable acts or practices against consumers
unclean hands
unjust enrichment
creating a monopoly-antitrust
commingle funds
conversion
also research - benders forms florida rule 1.280c7 , federal rules civil handbook for prot order.

dibh hearing 25-06

Clerk : mortage -doc stamps , title chain
I got the clerk thing from another friend
add capacity to that and agency ie do they have? which they don't

Tax Law
http://www.archive.org/search.php?query=tax%20law

http://www.archive.org/details/taxliens00nich

recordings
http://www.4shared.com/account/dir/26791033/bb0e1503/sharing.html

http://www.4shared.com/dir/30206089/d75fdb09/MAILING_TIP.html
http://moneyonaccount.com/downloads/RedemptionByMethod/Postal%20Stamp%20Usage/Postal%20Power.doc

Neomorpheus
http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web/webClient.jsp?masterId=41875&cmd=wc

Adverse claim
http://www.jstor.org/pss/1598032?cookieSet=1
http://www.jstor.org/pss/793907
FINANCIAL CODE
SECTION 952-954

Notice to settle a case (cali)
http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/forms/documents/cm200.pdf

http://www.lectlaw.com/forma.htm
Legal forms

http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=TXAxVJDw2G8C&printsec=frontcover&dq=9781588521200&source=bl&ots=cySBhaW4fx&sig=jeATBOl4o8VVzmxxlc_Y1NNIymE&hl=en&ei=2lp0S62KG5Dw0gTBr6CzCQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CAoQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=&f=true
on advanced trusts and docs

hague convention on the recognition of trusts
http://www.hcch.net/index_en.php?act=conventions.text&cid=59

http://books.google.com/books?id=_Ao9AAAAIAAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=trusts+and+equity&lr=&source=gbs_similarbooks_r&cad=3#v=onepage&q=trusts%20and%20equity&f=false
A selection of leading cases in equity, with notes By Frederick Thomas White, Owen Davies Tudor, John Innes Clark Hare, Horace Binney Wallace

http://books.google.com/books?id=sDTkFr4okkUC&printsec=frontcover&dq=trusts+and+equity&lr=&ei=lWV0S--HLYeuNbCQwKkE&cd=20#v=onepage&q=&f=true
Essentials of equity and trusts law By John Duddington
perfect for beginners

various books on trusts, at least one is marked above
http://www.hammickslegal.co.uk/shop/browse.asp?mscssid=RFWBFE3K61DE8JC0CVKHU0G0DGLJABL8&CT=NA&CategoryGroupID=31

administration of justice act uk
http://www.opsi.gov.uk/RevisedStatutes/Acts/ukpga/1982/cukpga_19820053_en_1

Judicial trustees act uk
http://www.opsi.gov.uk/RevisedStatutes/Acts/ukpga/1896/cukpga_18960035_en_1

I would write diagonally.
[21:34:34] Michael613: With that statement you justed expressed the trust. wi
[21:34:54] Michael613: I would send it to the CFO
[21:35:54] Adrian Clegg: OK That's interesting. A little practice run for the mortgage but I bet that's different eh?
[21:36:42] Michael613: Your expressing the trust then you file the UCC
[21:36:45] silew: Just found this
[21:36:53] silew: CW 2/7/10
The moment you get that offer in the mail - bill, indictment, whatever - that’s when you want to form the trust, by expressing the trust by a qualified signature, then you want to think about the relationship you’re forming, by holding that hot potato. You want to be able to make sure you can claim a trust and prove a trust (four elements of a trust, four methods of forming a trust) by having a record. Now you can assign parties, assign the trustee, and correct the construment. The treasure is not in the assets of the trust, but in the knowledge and understanding that a trust was formed.
Definition of scienter, [pron. Say-en-ter] Black’s law: ‘a degree of knowledge that makes a person legally responsible for the consequences of his or her act, or omission; the fact of an act having been done knowingly, especially as a ground for a civil damage or a criminal punishment. A mental state consisting of an intent to deceive, manipulate or defraud. Scienter action; one in which the plaintiff must prove that the defendant acted knowingly, or knew of the danger.” Only a real, live man or woman can have Scienter. There is no Scienter in the public, they’re all dead fictions. But if they have a record of your act, that is confirmation of your intent and purpose, even if you didn’t know you were forming a trust. So the intent and purpose with the will, and the knowledge and understanding, which is Scienter, that makes you a private, real man, or you really lose your mind. All those people who are operating in the public have lost their mind, because they have no knowledge or understanding of what’s really going on. You are a fiction; a lunatic operating in commerce. You’re acting as a fiction/surety. The knowledge of the truth shall set you free. The offer for the obligation is free, but ‘free’ is not free of an obligation. The real obligation is to know and understand. That doesn’t come free. That’s why you’re hypothecated and pledged in to a fiction realm. If you want to operate in the private like a Sovereign King, then you must know and understand. Today we do not, and all of us operate in fiction-land. In the private, you have to have Scienter to enter into any kind of agreement, but not in the public. They demonstrate intent and purpose by the formation of a record to show you knew and understood. Q: but what if it’s a fraud ab initio, where these court/corporations aren’t even registered with the Sect of the State? CW; they don’t have to be. They’re all colorable offices. If you don’t object, your omission is an act confirming your intent. You can express the trust, but that might not be as effective as if you changed your Master File with the IRS. Q: What about criminal indictments? CW; same thing. You form the trust when you get the offer. It doesn’t necessarily have to tie in to the SS account, though that’s what they’re trying to gain access to the SS Trust account by getting you in dishonor under d/c (debtor/creditor). To change the IMF in the DIB hearing, you come in with proof of the trust, and order them to correct the record. I don’t need to know what’s in the IMF, I just need to give them the correct info and tell them to correct the record. Q; you refer to using d/c processes, could you elaborate. CW We use Administrative processes, basically Notary presentment, which is what you do under Administrative remedy. Use the Notary to prove the trust. That’s the extent of it. If I make reference to the UCC, I’m really not quoting UCC verbatim, I’m using the intent of what UCC is presenting. I refer to UCC 9-210 for debt validation to get a dishonor in a foreclosure to rescind the signature on the contracts and come back in proving the trust. Use d/c to get out of d/c, and into trusts. Then remain in trust and don’t do debt anymore.
Caller asks about the need to go into their fictional courts. CW I’ve got some shocking news for everybody. They didn’t leave the Republic, we did. We’re the ones that are empowering the whole thing, and we need to cut their authority off, then the paper fictions fall to the ground and dissipate. But the Republic is held in trust, waiting to be freed. The way to do that is to pay the debt. Like I spoke about earlier, they don’t have to have scienter in their realm. Same thing for a bona fide purchaser under d/c. When you purchased something, did you give a Notice of Adverse Claim? If not, then they are a bona fide purchaser. [Blacks 6th: “One who has purchased property for value without any notice of any defects in the title of the seller. One who pays valuable consideration, has no notice of the outstanding rights of others, and acts in good faith. One who takes trust property for value and without notice of breach of trust and who is not knowingly part of an illegal transaction.”] CW “Now they can take without notice. If they were taking my property by my agreement, that I was going to sell the courthouse steps my property, by operation of law, cuz that’s what they do, and I had a superior claim, and if I didn’t make the claim properly, then I didn’t give notice of a claim that was adverse to them selling the property. (sic) Without an adverse claim, a bona fide purchaser can take the property free and clear, and now he’s got the property and the deed can transfer”.

PAYIN BILLS
I know that if u wanna pay bills u are gonna have to use trade secret info to do it , so I am doing some research to learn how to submit it & here is some info I found thru the patent laws
[06:08:54] imaginethe1: 24.02 Method of Submitting Trade Secret, Proprietary, and/or Protective Order Materials [R-6] - 700 Examination of Applications
724.02 Method of Submitting Trade Secret, Proprietary, and/or Protective Order Materials [R-6]

Information which is considered by the party submitting the same to be either trade secret material or proprietary material, and any material subject to a protective order, must be clearly labeled as such and be filed in a sealed, clearly labeled, envelope or container. Each document or item must be clearly labeled as a "Trade Secret" document or item, a "Proprietary" document or item, or as an item or document "Subject To Protective Order." It is essential that the terms "Confidential," "Secret," and "Restricted" or "Restricted Data" not be used when marking these documents or items in order to avoid confusion with national security information documents which are marked with these terms (note also MPEP § 121). If the item or document is "Subject to Protective Order" the proceeding, including the tribunal, must be set forth on each document or item. Of course, the envelope or container, as well as each of the documents or items, must be labeled with complete identifying information for the file to which it is directed, including the Office or area to which the envelope or container is directed.

Examples of appropriate labels for such an envelope or container addressed to an application are as follows: (Appropriate changes would be made for papers filed in a reexamination file.)

A. "TRADE SECRET MATERIAL NOT OPEN TO PUBLIC. TO BE OPENED ONLY BY EXAMINER OR OTHER AUTHORIZED U.S. PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE EMPLOYEE.

DO NOT SCAN

In re Application of

Application No.

Filed:

For: (Title of Invention)

TC Art Unit:

Examiner:

B. "PROPRIETARY MATERIAL NOT OPEN TO PUBLIC. TO BE OPENED ONLY BY EXAMINER OR OTHER AUTHORIZED U.S. PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE EMPLOYEE.

DO NOT SCAN

In re Application of

Application No.

Filed:

For: (Title of Invention)

TC Art Unit:

Examiner:

C. "MATERIAL SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER - NOT OPEN TO PUBLIC. TO BE OPENED ONLY BY EXAMINER OR OTHER AUTHORIZED U.S. PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE EMPLOYEE.

DO NOT SCAN

Tribunal Issuing Protective Order:

Civil Action or Other Identification No.:

Date of Order:

Current Status of Proceeding: (Pending, Stayed, etc.)

In re application of:

Application No.

Filed:

For: (Title of Invention)

TC Art Unit:

Examiner:

The envelope or container must be accompanied by a transmittal letter which also contains the same identifying information as the envelope or container. The transmittal letter must also state that the materials in the envelope or container are considered trade secrets or proprietary, or are subject to a protective order, and are being submitted for consideration under MPEP § 724. A petition under 37 CFR 1.59 and fee therefor ( 37 CFR 1.17(g)) to expunge the information, if found not to be **>material to patentability<, should accompany the envelope or container.

In order to ensure that such an envelope or container is not mishandled, either prior to reaching the Office, or in the Office, the envelope or container should be hand-carried to the Customer Window located at:

U.S. Patent and Trademark Office

Customer Service Window

Randolph Building

401 Dulany Street

Alexandria, VA 22314

The envelope or container may also be mailed to the Commissioner for Patents, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450.

Upon receipt of the envelope or container, the Office will place the envelope or container in an Artifact folder if the application is an Image File Wrapper (IFW) application. If the application is maintained in paper, the confidential or proprietary information will be retained in the envelope or container.

Land acquisition
http://www.teamlaw.org/links.htm

http://www.bbc.co.uk/supplying/freelancers/docs/invoice_example_freelance.pdf
invoice

http://www.rpglibrary.org/settings/roughmagic/places.shtml
crazy franco-prussian empire

http://www.sterlingsecure.co.uk/sterlingbond/home/downloads.shtml
escrow

http://www.myoffshoreaccounts.com/english/DeltaQuest_ESCROW-Bank-Account

Crown debts act
http://www.opsi.gov.uk/RevisedStatutes/Acts/ukpga/1801/cukpga_18010090_en_1

http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0000814830&owner=exclude&count=40
uk fund inc.

Bill Thornton on court procedure
http://www.reddit.com/r/CLVideos/comments/93sxh/bill_thornton/

stop foreclosure, great doc
http://livingfreeandclear.com/wp-content/uploads/file/Stopforeclosureauction.pdf

On trusts
http://thelastoutpost.com/video-5/law-seminars/the-legacy.html

UCC
http://ia360931.us.archive.org/3/items/smithrobersonsbu07smit/smithrobersonsbu07smit.pdf

Liens
http://www.englishfinancialassociates.com/lien.html

http://www.englishfinancialassociates.com/consensual.html

Bill thornton

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2812198344215780795#

http://www.reddit.com/r/CLVideos/comments/93sxh/bill_thornton/

http://www.reddit.com/r/CLVideos/comments/8usj5/bill_thornton_motions_and_related_procedure/
Motions

http://www.reddit.com/r/CLVideos/comments/8v4iz/bill_thornton_forms_and_related_procedure/
Forms

http://www.ceoemail.com/
ceo’s emails

Talkshoe | the 2nd of Jerry Kane Updates, scheduled on the 1st
Monday of every Month.
Topic Foreclosure and Mortgage Fraud.

Call in (724-444-7444
Call ID: 39904#

To mute, in or out press *6
To ask a question press *8

Or click here http://www.talkshoe.com/tc/39904
to connect directly thru talkshoe

Jerry's web site
http://privateaudio.homestead.com

Click on the Jerry Kane tab at the top of the page
enter password: makeme

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Good_faith

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fiduciary

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trustee_Investments_Act_1961

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variation_of_Trusts_Act_1958

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Use_%28law%29

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trust_%28property%29

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persuasive_writing

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scienter

go to the 2/23/10 Creditors in Commerce call and start listening when Robert is introduced. He and a trained accountant named Tracy are on at around 26 mins into the call and talk pretty much on point until about an hour before the end of the call on the topic of T accounts and accepted for value. I know it is not specifically about trusts and trust law, but it will serve to enlighten some who are not familiar with accounting principles and applying them to our intended outcomes. These are unlisted calls on talkshoe and you can access them from http://www.creditorsincommerce.com/audio-conference-calls.php

or
http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web/talkCast.jsp?masterId=18856&cmd=tc

http://countyrangers.org/index.html
Post office remedy

http://www.homestead.org/land/Legals/HowtoReadYourDeed.htm
Deeds


Provided by a colleague for all to research. :peace:
I'll make no subscription to their paradise.

All Rights Reserved - Without Prejudice - Without Recourse - Non-Assumpsit
Errors & Omissions Excepted
User avatar
treeman
 
Posts: 2821
Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 2:33 pm
Location: On the Land

Re: Trusts in Court?

Postby retlaw » Tue Feb 08, 2011 9:02 pm

"In England, declinatory pleas to the jurisdiction and dilatory to the persons were (prior to the juricature act) sometimes by analogy to common law, termed "pleas in abatement."

taken from page 16, "ABATEMENT AND REVIVAL" Blacks fourth 1951

you must remember that america copied everything from england,
over here on this side of the atlantic there are no acts or statutes on non-statutory abatements,
but they still work, if done correctly of coarse,
retlaw
 
Posts: 150
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 1:11 am

Re: Trusts in Court?

Postby the_common_law_reverend_kenny » Tue Feb 08, 2011 9:05 pm

Abatement (Law def.) .
a. a reduction of a tax assessment.
b.the termination of a nuisance.
c.a wrongful entry on land made by a stranger, after the owner's death and before the owner's heir or devisee has obtained possession.
d.a decrease in the legacies of a will when the assets of an estate are insufficient to pay all general legacies in full.

Here I think we are dealing with B.

So any action that causes a cease to the proceedings is an Abatement. i.e Asking them if they are on Oath etc...there must be (is) many ways to lawfully do that like: questioning the jurisdiction of the court or in case above making good case to 'NAME' is corporation.


BUT again, anyone who gets it right would do so in chambers, private most prob-lee, I would say. :sun: ( the main difference about England is that things are done in private behind closed doors)....
SOVEREIGN: not controlled by outside forces: autonomous; self-governing; independent "a sovereign people" <> "by any peaceful administritive means necessary" - the way of the order.
the_common_law_reverend_kenny
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 773
Joined: Fri Oct 30, 2009 1:18 pm
Location: Fidach Diplomatic Outpost near You

Re: Trusts in Court?

Postby ArturoDekko » Wed Feb 09, 2011 1:16 am

Treeman :giggle: Now that is what I call a list of useful links. Months of reading. It is a bit tucked away in this little ole thread. I would think be of benefit to others if copied to the media library. :sun:
S E E F O R Y O U R S E L F

Know yourself and you shall know the truth. The truth shall set you free.
User avatar
ArturoDekko
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 647
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2009 11:17 am
Location: Carmarthenshire, Wales

PreviousNext

Return to Trusts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest