From what I have seen, responding the to question “Are you Mr S Strawman” appears to be more important than whether you enter the court in common law jurisdiction. So I have below some responses that may help that I have collected. I would welcome more ideas.
1. In the presents of God, do you have proof of claim that I am obligated to give you my name.
2. If I were to answer that question, would I not be confessing to being a legal fiction, and therefore be subject to your jurisdiction; and a legal liability that I did not enter here with today; and I choose to decline.
3. If I were to answer that, wouldn't I then be a confessed fiction required to plied to a corparate idle, a false idle such as this court of fiction?
4. Wouldn't I be condemning myself to spend eternity in hell for the crime of acknowledgement?
5. Excuse me Sir, are you asking me to repudiate my relationship with the lord?
6. Sir, are you asking me to pray to the court?
7. Excuse me, did I here you correctly. Did you just compel me to cast witness against myself?
8. Sir, if I were to answer that question would I not be confessing to being that legal fiction, corporate entity named on your paper? Yes or no for the record please. Is that the assumption that you will be taking?
9. Sir, are you compelling me to cast witness against myself, that I should confess to being the legal fiction entity on your paper?
10. For the record, I am standing here in the kingdom of natures God. Would you please establish for the record since you have chosen to enter my kingdom, where are you standing, and where does this so called court stand. Does this court stand in the kingdom of the Lord, or is it operating under some other lesser venue of law? For the record please. And if you don't answer, then we'll assume it is operating under a lesser venue, and you are now working under my commission.
11. I have no name Sir, names are for corporations, you may address me as John
12. Sir, upon your oath, is hearsay allowed in this court. I can only say to you that I am commonly called John of the Smith family.