It's not done and dusted yet - so you will have to be weary about using it as a direct . ref. read this topic (last coupla pages of) and you'll see what i mean....
A judge has said in front of me in a hearing that the failure of people (the courts) to address me as I so choose, MAY BRING UP ISSUES OF HUMAN RIGHTS.
I am supposed to have yet another hearing to decide whether the orig. decision taken by a diff, judge (at Northapmton CCBC) was valid. I am planning NEVER to let it get that far....
She has not yet decided, or ruled, that my human rights were violated.....so, not effectively 'case law' just yet.
And, being utterly selfish, I don't want to upset her apple cart too much BEFORE I let rip with my "blindingly-obvious-common-sense-and bugger-them-with-their-own-stupid-rules-hyper-cannon Notice"... just waiting for written confirmation of her latest 'directions'.
I guess I am saying : lets WIN one 'case', outright, no 'fog-of-war' fudges, (- she has already overturned her OWN CCJ in front of me), THEN we can ALL use it as a reference.
Which reminds me, time to write to my local Mag's court to see on EXACTLY WHAT GROUNDS (of the several i mentioned in my appeal application) they have GRANTED my appeal hearing in regard to their farcical 'liability for council tax' comedy show last month:

Live from Eastbourne Magistrate's court, we bring you "Council Tax Comedy Hour" - starring Ms Shouty and her gang of 3: Ms. Onthe. T. Ake, Mr. Neversays. A. Word and Ms. Politebut Stupid...
and introducing, from the Council, Mr. Perjurous and his chum Mr. Noidea Whatestoppel means!
(I feel another 'promotional' "Gameshow Video coming on.. hmmmm")
Andrew: