I met the freeman concept by watching John Harris talking about the person. I still don't have a definition of what it means in statute. I suspect it means ALL the definitions of PERSON.
The thing is........ALL PERSONS WITHIN THE JURISDICTION of the UK. So my person is not the problem. If I take hold of it as MINE and steer it ,(like a boat) away from the UK. So getting rid of the trappings of Citizenship (notice the drivers licence form )(you must be a UK citizen to apply!!!!!) You can sail away, the UK is the FICTIONAL PERSON we should take a good look at. Not Mr Smith, we already looked at that.
Its claiming the benefits of citizenship that's the problem. But some benefits are National not Societal!
Its a subtle but important distinction.
The PERSON within the UK is like a two handled drinking cup. YOUR drinking cup, but the Govt have a hand on the second handle. They will fill it full of something, according to the rules, but you will pay sooner or later, according to the rules.
You may take your cup out of the UK. They should let go of their handle, you can contract with anyone, they take hold of the second handle instead of the UK. Or it can be just you , your beer, your rules.!! I could have explained that better, maybe you get the drift of it. Its hard because the government and its agencies are playing more than one part. They are the National Enforcement team, enforcing the law in accord with a courts decision. They are also a voluntary club, with lots of rules, for those in the club, which they also enforce in accordance with a different kind of courts decision. Two roles, two Jurisdictions, very confusing , very convenient if you want to tax and control a huge group but have no real right to. Rule by confusion.