the Crown liability act.

the Crown liability act.

Postby enegiss » Sat Aug 20, 2011 9:46 pm

worth reading, :grin: its Canadian based but ime presuming it is the same Crown. peace and light. ps any good stuff in here please post so i can see it, thanks, as i am not to good at the de-construction of acts
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
if you wish to create a favourable History, then you have to start now.
enegiss
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 1325
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2009 9:10 pm

Re: the Crown liability act.

Postby huntingross » Sun Aug 21, 2011 7:16 am

Regina -v- The Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, ex parte Indian Association of Alberta [1982] QB 892; [1982] 2 All ER 118

1982. CA. Lord Denning, Kerr LJ, May LJ

Commonwealth, Constitutional

The court considered an application leave to request a judicial review seeking a declaration that treaty obligations entered into by the Crown to the Indian peoples of Canada were still owed by Her Majesty in right of Her government in the UK. Held: The claim failed. The Crown was not single and indivisible but separate in respect of each self-governing territory within the Commonwealth. After 1926 "the Crown was no longer single and indivisible. It was separate and divisible for each self-governing dominion or province or territory". This principle applied as much to a colony as to a dominion.


http://www.swarb.co.uk/lisc/Const19801984.php
Success nourishes hope
User avatar
huntingross
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 4324
Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 11:29 pm
Location: FIDACH, Near Edinburgh

Re: the Crown liability act.

Postby enegiss » Sun Aug 21, 2011 8:25 am

thanks HR, ime just trying to get my head around some of dean cliffords work,
After 1926 "the Crown was no longer single and indivisible. It was separate and divisible for each self-governing dominion or province or territory". This principle applied as much to a colony as to a dominion.
thanks for the link
if you wish to create a favourable History, then you have to start now.
enegiss
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 1325
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2009 9:10 pm

Re: the Crown liability act.

Postby greg » Sun Aug 21, 2011 1:26 pm

Why 1926? Is this connected to leaving the gold standard in 1925? Anyone know more about this?
greg
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 343
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 1:36 pm

Re: the Crown liability act.

Postby huntingross » Sun Aug 21, 2011 9:28 pm

Take your pick

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1926_in_Canada

Unfortunately the origin of the law quote didn't engage in the reason....so I'm not sure....

[Seems to be Autonomy was granted in 1926]
Success nourishes hope
User avatar
huntingross
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 4324
Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 11:29 pm
Location: FIDACH, Near Edinburgh


Return to The Person (legal fiction)

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest