Postby Pleasuredome » Fri Jun 19, 2009 4:48 pm

There is a mysterious thing called the allocutus with which some of us are very familiar. That means this: that after conviction and before sentence it is right for the clerk of the court to say to the convicted person, "Have you anything to say why the judgment of the court should not be passed on you?" In my experience over some years, the convicted person never had the least idea, and it may be nobody else had either, what he was expected to say in answer to that question, what reason he could possibly have at that stage, when he had been convicted, for saying no sentence should be pronounced.

Hansard - 24th may 1966 - Lords sitting

One thing that could/should be said is, "For and on the record, I waive all benefits and privileges of the court, and as consideration, I relieve the court of its duty to perform in this instance"
User avatar
Posts: 145
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 3:41 pm

Re: Allocutus/Allocution

Postby huntingross » Fri Jun 19, 2009 9:00 pm

Bzzzzz bang.....imagine how that would go down.

Stunned silence would be a guess
Success nourishes hope
User avatar
Posts: 4324
Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 11:29 pm
Location: FIDACH, Near Edinburgh

Re: Allocutus/Allocution

Postby markie b » Sat Jun 20, 2009 4:01 pm

i was acting in my natural entity/person my honour there for the legal act thats being implied didnt exist upon my natural entity/person

i mean hey a cop can at as a police man im damn sure i can act aswell :p
when injustice becomes law
rebellion becomes duty
markie b
Posts: 707
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 12:42 am

Return to The Court System

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest