by Farmer » Thu May 26, 2011 8:22 am
I'm beginning to wonder whether there is any point of trying to get a magistrate to acknowledge the oath they have taken. When reading the posts on the police forum recently, the point they were making on there was that they as police officers were automatically under their oath; they found it strange that it was even being questioned. I think I would agree with that now, after all, in the past, once the oath was given, you were bound by it whether you acknowledged it or not. The same must be true for magistrates as well. I think the solution to this is to simply present the oath as evidence in court, plus first asking a few questions like is this a hearing or trial first to get the magistrate to unsuspectingly first pen the dots which you later connect to close the trap as Mark Stevens does.
If you're scared of 'them' poisoning 'us' with some shit then maybe you haven't noticed the shit they are already poisoning us with.
- prajna - fmotl.co.uk forum 2011