by nameless » Thu Jan 28, 2010 9:00 am
This is how I see it.
Going right back to the beginning, mother (informant) would have been the Grantor of the Trust, baby would have been the Beneficiary, and the Government the Trustee. We are given until age 7 to lay claim to the Trust, they knowing that we never will. By working age we have not inherited, and if mother is still alive, they get us to sign over grantorship of the Cesti Que Trust to them, thereby giving them access to the Foreign Situs Trust.
All we have to do is lay claim, as Grantors and Beneficiary, to the Cesti Que Trust. My reasoning on this is because in my case, mother, as Grantor, died, and I as beneficiary, never received what was rightfully mine, and this is where the stitch up occurred. It's simple, I know, but then it always is. It's our adversaries who make it complicated in order to deceive.
My suggestion to remedy this is to include these facts as our truth and make them part of our affidavit to Mr Fabian Brown. Thereby, we have expressed the Trust, and, thinking aloud, can we make these facts of truth part of our lien process in order to enforce these truths?
“Whoever may be guilty of abuse of power, be it Government, State, Employer, Trade Union or whoever, the law must provide a speedy remedy. Otherwise the victims will find their own remedy."
Lord Denning